Load-Shedding costs RSA economy millions (22/01/2008)
Eskom's load shedding practice is hitting the RSA economy hard with financial losses escalating with each power cut. Not only the manufacturing industries, but also medium and small enterprises across the economic spectrum are suffering because of bad strategic planning and poor management.
The financial impact on the economy is estimated at several billion rand and in addition to direct financial losses, Eskom's unreliable power supply has resulted in many industries having to spend millions on supplementary power support systems - something our economy can ill afford at this stage.
And then we hear that the situation is going to get even worse - one wonders what happened to all the promises of infrastructure improvement when South Africa was announced as the 2010 World Cup hosts. The clever people in the ANC Government and Eskom obviously do not consider electricity supply of strategic importance. It is time that citizens, retailers and manufacturers stand together and hold the Government accountable.
Another alarming aspect of load shedding is the fact that it will inevitably further add to escalating food prices and will also contribute to food inflation over the next few years which will impact directly on the living standard of people on the lower end of the economic scale, many of whom voted for the ANC.
Just a word of advice to all those millions of households and businessmen affected by the power cuts - you can do something about it - next time use your vote and get a credible alternative in power that will again manage the country according to first world standards. And please, when we get to the 2009 elections, do remember the many dark nights and frustrating hours you spent in traffic jams, not to mention the losses you incurred in your business as a result of the power cuts.
The CDP, as a member of the newly formed Christian Democratic Alliance, will not keep you in the dark. Our economic development policy is based on sound principles with the emphasis on strategic infrastructure support. For a better future - vote CDP/CDA in 2009
Joe Hanekom
Co-Federal Leader, CDP
Floor Crossing (06/09/2007)
It appears that those who feel that they can benefit from floor crossing are in favour of it, while those who fear it could work against them are opposed to it. The press has consistently taken the view that floor crossing is not acceptable as according to them it goes against the will of the electorate who had voted for a particular party.
To make an informed decision on this matter, however, the following needs to be taken into account:
- The proportional representation electoral system used in South Africa, which I personally support, affords a voice to many, at all levels of government who would otherwise never have been heard. However, it also gives great power to the political parties over their representatives.
- Should an MP, MPL or councillor, during his/her term, find that the party they represent, no longer adhere to the basic policies or principles they were elected on; or that leadership has become increasing dictatorial and prescriptive, floor crossing would give them the opportunity to, without loosing their livelihood, express their dissatisfaction.
- Should an MP, MPL or councillor disagree with the leadership of the party, on one or other matter of conscience, they invariably have to bite their tongue, as opposite views are seldom tolerated and as the threat of expulsion is ever present.
- We need to remember that under the constituency system, elected members were always permitted to leave the parties they were in, without loosing their position.
Thus, as with most things in life, floor crossing could be either a good thing or a bad thing, depending on what motivates the floor crossing.
Theunis G Botha
Christian Democratic Party
Floor Crossing (01/09/2007).
A report in the Mail and Guardian August 31 to September 6 2007 quotes Toni Leon former Leader of the DA as saying that new parties brought little to the political landscape and instead contributed to a political mitosis and entrenched one-party domination of the process.
There is, however, some thing he forgets to mention and that is that the DA owes its majority in the Cape Town Metro to a coalition formed with various smaller parties. I say smaller parties because in comparison with the ANC the DA itself is just a small party unable to either address the needs of voters or fulfil some significant niche in the political arena. Before every election Tony Leon has, without fail and without success, tried to influence the voters, who in principle, vote for "smaller" parties, to vote for the DA. He tried for years to turn South Africa into a two party state comprising of Socialists and Liberals, only paying lip service to the concept of a multi party democracy.
Crossing the floor to "new" parties is symptomatic of the fact that existing parties such as the DA are not the answer as far as many voters are concerned. If they were, these floor crossers would have gone to them, and the DA would have been strong supporters of floor crossing instead of opposing it, as they do now that they don't expect to benefit from it.
Floor crossing, like most things in life, can be either negative or positive, depending on the motive behind it. If it is used for monetary advantage or egotistical reasons it is a bad thing. If however the decision is based on a principled consideration then it could be a good thing.
Theunis Botha
Party Leader
|